Wednesday, January 28, 2009

Time for a Thesis

FL 200

What is a thesis statement?
A thesis statement:
  • tells the reader how you will interpret the significance of the subject matter under discussion.
  • is a road map for the paper; in other words, it tells the reader what to expect from the rest of the paper.
  • makes a claim that others might dispute.
  • is usually a single sentence somewhere in your first paragraph that presents your argument to the reader. The rest of the paper, the body of the essay, gathers and organizes evidence that will persuade the reader of the logic of your interpretation.
  • presuposses that you are going to take a position or develop a claim about a subject, thus you may need to convey that position or claim near the beginning of your draft.
How do I get a thesis?
  • A thesis is the result of a lengthy thinking process. Formulating a thesis is not the first thing you do after reading an essay assignment. Before you develop an argument on any topic, you have to collect and organize evidence, look for possible relationships between known facts (such as surprising contrasts or similarities), and think about the significance of these relationships. Once you do this thinking, you will probably have a "working thesis," a basic or main idea, an argument that you think you can support with evidence but that may need adjustment along the way.
  • Start by focusing on what is NOT obvious. Look for instances where the text vacillates or equivocates. Focus on the cracks, fissures, interstices in the text through which you may glance hidden meanings. Tease meaning from the text. Make it yield data.
  • Interrogate the text: Ask questions about the situations, events, or aspects that have excited your curiosity. Asking questions you stimulate yourself to provide answers and generate connections.
  • Bounce off your ideas or plans aloud with a friend: It matters little if the person in question knows what you are writing on. Sometimes when you hear yourself telling what you are thinking it all becomes clear.
  • Draw what you are thinking: Diagrams help you visualize your thoughts better and often lead to a tighter thesis.
  • Once you think you have a arrived to a thesis, make sure that you follow the advice in the handout titled THESIS STATEMENT BASICS. Make sure that your thesis is an arguable idea or proposition the provides a smart answer to a "problem" you have previously identified. Make certain that your thesis is NOT a not a title or a fragment, a question, a command, a fact, an announcement, an obvious or evident statement, an unarguable personal opinion, a broad generalization, a simplistic proposition, an immature or tasteless proposal, or a wordy confusing mess. You want the opposite of that.
  • Your thesis often evolves as you develop your argument. Make sure to revisit your thesis as you write. Tweak it as needed so that it continues to serve as a road map of the paper for your reader.
How do I know if my thesis is strong?
If there's time, run it by your instructor or make an appointment at the Writing Center to get some feedback. Even if you do not have time to get advice elsewhere, you can do some thesis evaluation of your own. When reviewing your first draft and its working thesis, ask yourself the following:
  • Have I taken a position that others might challenge or oppose?If your thesis simply states facts that no one would, or even could, disagree with, it's possible that you are simply providing a summary, rather than making an argument.
  • Is my thesis statement specific enough?
  • Thesis statements that are too vague often do not have a strong argument. If your thesis contains words like "good" or "successful," see if you could be more specific: why is something "good"; what specifically makes something "successful"? Does my thesis pass the "So what?" test? If a reader's first response is, "So what?" then you need to clarify, to forge a relationship, or to connect to a larger issue.
  • Does my essay support my thesis specifically and without wandering? If your thesis and the body of your essay do not seem to go together, one of them has to change. It's o.k. to change your working thesis to reflect things you have figured out in the course of writing your paper. Remember, always reassess and revise your writing as necessary.
The following handout: OVERVIEW OF THE ACADEMIC ESSAY from Harvard University's Writing Center provides one of the best explanations of critical argumentative writing that I have ever seen.

Tuesday, January 27, 2009

The History Channel presents: The Conquerors - El Cid

ESPAÑOL 312

The History Channel presents: The Conquerors - El Cid.
Known as El Cid (The Leader), the 11-century warrior Rodrigo Díaz de Vivar is often hailed for having "freed his fatherland from the Moors". Yet recent scholarship reveals many contradictions between reality and myth about Spain's first national hero. In one contemporary's words he was "the scourge of his time".

Was he arrogant and insubordinate, a stern overlord driven by an unquenchable thirst for money? Before his death, he was already celebrated in a poem written in tribute of the conquest of Almería; posthumously he was immortalized in the great epic Poema de Mio Cid and was the centerpiece for countless other works of literature.

Equally at home in the feudal kingdoms of northern Spain and the Moorish-held lands of the south, when he died in Valencia in 1099, he was ruler of an independent principality that he had carved out of eastern Spain. Was Rodrigo a zealous Christian leader or a mercenary that sold his martial skills to Christian and Muslim alike?

The episode was uploaded to You Tube and divided in five segments each lasting 10 minutes or less.

Enjoy!! It is really interesting.

Conquerors : El Cid part 1


Conquerors : El Cid part 2


Conquerors : El Cid part 3


Conquerors : El Cid part 4


Conquerors : El Cid part 5

Cat in the Rain - A couple takes

FL200

Yesterday we carried out a "close reading" of "Cat in the Rain". This type of approach to literature is second nature now to many readers, yet it has a clear theoretical origin. What we did was to follow the central tenet of a critical approach called "New Criticism":
New Criticism (1930s–1960s): Coined in John Crowe Ransom’s The New Criticism (1941), this approach discourages the use of history and biography in interpreting a literary work. Instead, it encourages readers to discover the meaning of a work through a detailed analysis of the text itself. This approach was popular in the middle of the 20th century, especially in the United States, but has since fallen out of favor.

Note that New Criticism has "fallen out of favor" not because scholars do not perform "close readings" anymore, but rather because that kind of reading has become second nature. What has changed is that close readings are now seen by many as a first step in approaching a text. Close readings lead to enhanced critical readings that presume further theorizing and the use or deployment of additional theoretical aproaches.

Here is a one page analysis of the story. It comes to us from Germany: http://www.gs.cidsnet.de/englisch-online/Leistungskurs2/hemingway3.htm
  • Note what elements are left out by this reader.
  • Note what shifts in the chronology of the story the reader makes to solidify his/her views.
  • Note the internal contradictions in this reader's take on the story.
The reader, however, highlights two important aspects:
  • Children would want to "protect" a cat from the rain, whereas adults know cats can take care of themselves.
This is interesting given how everyone else is so concerned that George's American wife/girl does not get wet. Yesterday, as you recall, we wondered whether she is identifying with the cat: "The cat was trying to make herself so compact that she would not be dripped on. (...) ‘No, I’ll get it. The poor kitty out trying to keep dry under a table’" (1, ln. 14-15; 21).

SPARKNOTES offers this summary of the story:
Only two Americans are in the hotel. Their room faces the sea, a public garden, and a war monument. Many Italians come from far away to see the monument. That day, it is raining, and the American wife is looking out the window. She sees a cat under a table that is trying to keep dry. She tells her husband that she is going to get it. He tells her not to get wet. Downstairs, she is greeted by the hotel operator, whose seriousness and willingness to please she adores. When she goes outside, he sends a maid after her with an umbrella. She does not find the cat. She goes back upstairs feeling sad. She asks her husband if she should grow her hair out. He says that he likes it the way that it is. She decides that she wants a bun at the back of her neck, and a cat to stroke, and a table with her own silver, and some new clothing. He tells her to shut up and to find a book to read. She says that she still wants a cat. Just then, someone knocks at the door. It is the maid. She has brought up a cat, at the request of the hotel operator.
  • Note how terse and minimalistic the summary is.
  • Note how the story is told in the present tense. This should always be done in talking or writing about fiction. Stories, poems, plays, etc. always happen, as it were, in the present. That is, they are always "happening".
  • Note what points the reader takes for granted in offering this summary.
  • Note differences in the language chosen to summarize the story in comparison with the language of the text itself.
The take on the story offered by SPARKNOTES is strikingly different from what we considered yesterday:

The American wife expresses a desire for many things in this story. She tells her husband that if she cannot have any fun, then she might as well have things that she wants. In other words, this desire for material goods comes from an inability to acquire intangible goods such as fun and affection. This lack of intimacy is not entirely her husband's fault, of course. She also ignores his compliments.

This American way, desiring material objects and becoming bored, is contrasted with an Italian way of vacationing. The Italians arrive in the same location to see the war memorial and honor the war dead. They are more involved in the ideas of the place than in owning things from it. In addition, it is a more communal way of living, to honor the sacrifices of others, rather than to stay inside and read.

Their view appears more weighted towards Marxist and Psychoanalytical approaches.

You can find many other positions regarding this text online. As you know, there are sites that offer students the chance to read or use the ideas and or written work of other people. This is plagiarism and it is icky. However, just as a tool for the workshop it is interesting to look at a least one of them:
This is an excerpt from the paper...

From bulls to marlins, when Hemingway uses animals in his fiction they are purposefully used to create richer characterization for his human characters. For example, in The Old Man and the Sea, the Marlin is used as an almost worthy antagonist to Santiago and Santiago even admits there is not much difference between him and his fish.

In Cat In The Rain, the animal is a cat and it is significant enough to the story and characters that it rates a mention in the title of this short story. The cat has a twofold meaning to the story and the American female traveling with her husband. First, the cat symbolizes how human beings are often faced with larger, more hostile forces than they can contend with on their own. Second, the cat symbolizes the situation of the woman in her relationship. The woman seeks love, comfort, companionship and nurturing from her husband which she does not receive. She, therefore, like the cat "was trying to make herself so compact that she would not be dripped on" (Hemingway 167).

The cat also has a third relevance to the story and that is that it acts as a surrogate child for the women. She wants "to have a kitty to sit on my lap and purr when I stroke her" (Hemingway 169). She wants this as much as she yearns for long hair, i.e., some unique aspect to her identity which a child might serve for her, "I want to pull my hair back tight and smooth and make a big knot at the back that I can feel" (Hemingway...

  • Can you find problems with the selective explanation of the cat as a "symbol" in this paper?
  • Is the cat facing "larger, more hostile forces" than it can cope with?
  • Is the cat seeking "love, comfort, companionship and nurturing" from the American wife/girl?
  • The sexual interpretation of the cat as "symbol" is absent from this paper. Should it be there? How? How would it affect the argument as presented above?
  • Can you find problems with the way in which the writer expresses his/her ideas?
The questions I am posing here should help you understand the kind of treatment that I give your writing when I read your papers. They should help you be ready to cover all your bases as you prepare to come up with papers, titles, and the all important theses the vertebrate them.

Monday, January 26, 2009

Connell, Whitehead y Barrett

Español 312

Monadas, me quedé un pelín mustio hoy pues sentí que los 50 minutos apenas nos daban para todo lo que teníamos que hacer. Es una lástima, pero hay que apechugar, es decir, hay que echarle ganas al asunto.

Los textos teóricos o sociológiocos nos sirven de soporte para nuestra discusión de la representación de la masculinidad en los textos.

Por ejemplo, con el Poema del Mio Cid tenemos lo siguiente:
  • masculinidad hegemónica - la de el Cid, sus lugartenientes, Alfonso VI, Abengalbón, etc.
  • masculinidades subordinadas - la de los judíos (Raquel y Vidas), la de Yusuf, rey de Marruecos, las de los Infantes de Carrión, etc.
  • discurso del vasallaje - regula la relación entre el Cid y Alfonso VI, etc.
  • relaciones homosociales - hay una larga serie de relaciones entre hombres que o bien están en crisis o bien son celebradas como ejemplares
  • la frontera y la masculinidad
  • la violencia masculina y la mujer como su receptora
  • el artefacto cultural -el poema- y su rol como parte del discurso hegemónico castellano
  • etc.
Espero que el poema nos dé mucho que hablar el miércoles. ¡Si no, el film de seguro que sí!

Sunday, January 25, 2009

Torrente o el "macho ibérico"

Español 312

En 1998 Santiago Segura debutó como guionista, actor y director de su primera película: Torrente: El brazo tonto de la ley. El film tuvo un éxito enorme. Su secuea, Torrente 2 se convirtió en el de mayor éxito de recaudación en la historia del cine español, llegando a ingresar 28 millones de dólares.

El personaje principal es la perfecta caricatura del llamado "macho ibérico", como explica el propio Santiago Segura: “Torrente is everything I hate about my country all in one place.” Torrente "is a racist, a fascist, a sexist, a gay-basher, a hater of foreigners, a pig, an idiot, a pervert — for starters", afirma Jack Hitt en su artículo sobre Santiago Segura en el New York Times: "Sr. Gross Out".

ATENCIÓN: Lean el artículo de Hitt antes de ver el clip de la película. Su lectura les permitirá digerir mejor unas escenas que a lo mejor resultan chocantes u ofensivas para algunos.

Tengan presentes las observaciones de Connell y de Whitehead & Barrett sobre la historia de la masculinidad y las maneras en que se construye la misma. Torrente es más que una caricatura o sátira de la exagerada machez ibérica. Su performance revela muchas de las inseguridades y ansiedades que seriamente se teorizan y estudian desde la sociología y los estudios culturales.

Critical Reading - A Powerpuff Girls Example

FL 200

In class last Wednesday we saw how even seemingly trivial texts such as a cartoon episode can yield intriguing and ultimately critically relevant questions when subjected to a special kind of "reading": critical reading.

In a nutshell, this is exactly the kind of treatment we are going to be giving literary and non-literary texts in this class.

What follow is a more organized version of the notes on the Powerfpuff Girls episode we watched.

Powerpuff Girls: The Bear Facts




After Mojo JoJo kidnaps and blindfolds him, the Mayor has to rely on the Girls’very different individual accounts of the crime to figure out exactly what happened. But he is still at a loss to explain why the Girls keep giggling at him.

1.What’s in Chemical X? ¿What kind of experiment was this?
2.Why a scientist, a middle-aged, single man, Professor Utonium, feels compelled to create “3 perfect little girls?
a.How does that relate to what other “mad” scientists did before him, such as Frankenstein, Dr. Faustus (Faust), Rotwang (Metropolis), Lex Luthor, (Superman), Herbert West (Re-Animator), Bruce Banner (Hulk), Dr. Eldon Tyrell (Blade Runner), etc.?
b.What does his experiment suggest about him, sexually, socially, politically?
c.What does his peculiar name suggest about him?
3.Why is the Mayor depicted like the old monopolist in the board game Monopoly?
a.What does that suggest about the links between the corporate world and political power?
4.The “Play-School” telephone that serves to communicate with the Powerpuff Girls sits on the Mayor’s desk. Whose idea it was to have such an infantile looking gadget to confer with super-heroes every time the city is in danger?
a.Does this item serve to underline the Mayor’s infantile qualities?
5.Why can’t the Mayor read?
6.Is Ms. Sarah Bellum really running Townsville? For whom does she work?
7.Why does the Mayor draw a picture of himself as a “He-Man”? Is his own masculinity a source of anxiety for him?
8.Why does he call for his “Mommy” when he is attacked by Mojo Jojo?
9.Why is the girls arch-enemy also a “mad-scientist” like the Professor?
10.Why is he a super-gifted monkey?
11.Why does he speak with a Japanese accent?
12.There is a fade-to-black for a minute or so while the Mayor is in captivity. Why is this? How does this work? How does it relate to the conventions guiding the fade-to-black recourse in film?
13.Each of the girls tells the story of what happened differently.
a.What visual and narrative resources are used to illustrate each narrative focalization?
b.Are the stories the “same”?
c.What happens to the other two siblings in every single one of the individual narratives?
d.What does this say about the nature of stories and the possibility of an “objective/universal truth?
14.There is a pun between the term “bare facts” and the Mayor’s condition as revealed at the end?
a.Is this pun also undermining the notion of a true objective account or total truth?
15.Buttercup asks Blossom “Why is everything always about you?” after she starts narrating her story: Are narratives always about the narrator or narrative voice?
16.Why are Ms. Bellum’s spectacular hair and body always visible but her face always out of view? Is this how power works?
17.On another moment one of the girls complains the other’s story is “not making any sense”.
a.How is “sense” generated in a story?
b.What makes a story “make sense? Who decides that?
c.Is “sense” dependent on who is it that tells the story?
d.Is “sense” dependent on conventions regarding time (when) and place (where) and narrator (who)?
18.Are Mojo’s nunchakus part of his performance as a “Japanese” style villain?
19.Why are the little girls so ultra-violent?
20.Bubbles concludes her story and begins anew tying the end of a tale to its beginning and forming a narrative loop.
a.Is this a postmodern wink in which the narration’s self-referentiality suggests that tales are ultimately only about themselves as tales, as texts, as narrative?

Tuesday, January 20, 2009

LITERARY SCHOOLS OF THOUGHT AND GLOSSARY OF CRITICAL TERMS

FL200 & ESPAÑOL 312

It occurs to me that this brief outline of the major "schools" or "movements" in literary theory and criticism could come in very handy.

A more detailed discussion of these critical/theoretical approaches can be found here:
http://www.kristisiegel.com/theory.htm

USE WISELY AND ENJOY!

Literary Theory and Criticism

<http://sparkcharts.sparknotes.com/lit/literaryterms/section6.php>

Literary theory and literary criticism are interpretive tools that help us think more deeply and insightfully about the literature that we read. Over time, different schools of literary criticism have developed, each with its own approaches to the act of reading.

Schools of Interpretation

Cambridge School (1920s–1930s): A group of scholars at Cambridge University who rejected historical and biographical analysis of texts in favor of close readings of the texts themselves.

Chicago School (1950s): A group, formed at the University of Chicago in the 1950s, that drew on Aristotle’s distinctions between the various elements within a narrative to analyze the relation between form and structure. Critics and Criticisms: Ancient and Modern (1952) is the major work of the Chicago School.

Deconstruction (1967–present): A philosophical approach to reading, first advanced by Jacques Derrida that attacks the assumption that a text has a single, stable meaning. Derrida suggests that all interpretation of a text simply constitutes further texts, which means there is no “outside the text” at all. Therefore, it is impossible for a text to have stable meaning. The practice of deconstruction involves identifying the contradictions within a text’s claim to have a single, stable meaning, and showing that a text can be taken to mean a variety of things that differ significantly from what it purports to mean.

Feminist criticism (1960s–present): An umbrella term for a number of different critical approaches that seek to distinguish the human experience from the male experience. Feminist critics draw attention to the ways in which patriarchal social structures have marginalized women and male authors have exploited women in their portrayal of them. Although feminist criticism dates as far back as Mary Wollstonecraft’s A Vindication of the Rights of Woman (1792) and had some significant advocates in the early 20th century, such as Virginia Woolf and Simone de Beauvoir, it did not gain widespread recognition as a theoretical and political movement until the 1960s and 1970s.

Psychoanalytic criticism: Any form of criticism that draws on psychoanalysis, the practice of analyzing the role of unconscious psychological drives and impulses in shaping human behavior or artistic production. The three main schools of psychoanalysis are named for the three leading figures in developing psychoanalytic theory: Sigmund Freud, Carl Jung, and Jacques Lacan.

  • Freudian criticism (c. 1900–present): The view of art as the imagined fulfillment of wishes that reality denies. According to Freud, artists sublimate their desires and translate their imagined wishes into art. We, as an audience, respond to the sublimated wishes that we share with the artist. Working from this view, an artist’s biography becomes a useful tool in interpreting his or her work. “Freudian criticism” is also used as a term to describe the analysis of Freudian images within a work of art.
  • Jungian criticism (1920s–present): A school of criticism that draws on Carl Jung’s theory of the collective unconscious, a reservoir of common thoughts and experiences that all cultures share. Jung holds that literature is an expression of the main themes of the collective unconscious, and critics often invoke his work in discussions of literary archetypes.
  • Lacanian criticism (c. 1977–present): Criticism based on Jacques Lacan’s view that the unconscious, and our perception of ourselves, is shaped in the “symbolic” order of language rather than in the “imaginary” order of prelinguistic thought. Lacan is famous in literary circles for his influential reading of Edgar Allan Poe’s “The Purloined Letter.”

Marxist criticism: An umbrella term for a number of critical approaches to literature that draw inspiration from the social and economic theories of Karl Marx. Marx maintained that material production, or economics, ultimately determines the course of history, and in turn influences social structures.These social structures, Marx argued, are held in place by the dominant ideology, which serves to reinforce the interests of the ruling class. Marxist criticism approaches literature as a struggle with social realities and ideologies.

  • Frankfurt School (c. 1923–1970): A group of German Marxist thinkers associated with the Institute for Social Research in Frankfurt. These thinkers applied the principles of Marxism to a wide range of social phenomena, including literature. Major members of the Frankfurt School include Theodor Adorno, Max Horkheimer, Walter Benjamin, Herbert Marcuse, and Jürgen Habermas.

New Criticism (1930s–1960s): Coined in John Crowe Ransom’s The New Criticism (1941), this approach discourages the use of history and biography in interpreting a literary work. Instead, it encourages readers to discover the meaning of a work through a detailed analysis of the text itself. This approach was popular in the middle of the 20th century, especially in the United States, but has since fallen out of favor.

New Historicism (1980s–present): An approach that breaks down distinctions between “literature” and “historical context” by examining the contemporary production and reception of literary texts, including the dominant social, political, and moral movements of the time. Stephen Greenblatt is a leader in this field, which joins the careful textual analysis of New Criticism with a dynamic model of historical research.

New Humanism (c. 1910–1933): An American movement, led by Irving Babbitt and Paul Elmer More, that embraced conservative literary and moral values and advocated a return to humanistic education.

Post-structuralism (1960s–1970s): A movement that comprised, among other things, Deconstruction, Lacanian criticism, and the later works of Roland Barthes and Michel Foucault. It criticized structuralism for its claims to scientific objectivity, including its assumption that the system of signs in which language operates was stable.

Queer theory (1980s–present): A “constructivist” (as opposed to “essentialist”) approach to gender and sexuality that asserts that gender roles and sexual identity are social constructions rather than an essential, inescapable part of our nature. Queer theory consequently studies literary texts with an eye to the ways in which different authors in different eras construct sexual and gender identity. Queer theory draws on certain branches of feminist criticism and traces its roots to the first volume of Michel Foucault’s History of Sexuality (1976).

Russian Formalism (1915–1929): A school that attempted a scientific analysis of the formal literary devices used in a text. The Stalinist authorities criticized and silenced the Formalists, but Western critics rediscovered their work in the 1960s. Ultimately, the Russian Formalists had significant influence on structuralism and Marxist criticism.

Structuralism (1950s–1960s): An intellectual movement that made significant contributions not only to literary criticism but also to philosophy, anthropology, sociology, and history. Structuralist literary critics, such as Roland Barthes, read texts as an interrelated system of signs that refer to one another rather than to an external “meaning” that is fixed either by author or reader. Structuralist literary theory draws on the work of the Russian Formalists, as well as the linguistic theories of Ferdinand de Saussure and C. S. Peirce.

Literary Terms and Theories

Literary theory is notorious for its complex and somewhat inaccessible jargon. The following list defines some of the more commonly encountered terms in the field.

Anxiety of influence: A theory that the critic Harold Bloom put forth in The Anxiety of Influence: A Theory of Poetry (1973). Bloom uses Freud’s idea of the Oedipus complex (see below) to suggest that poets, plagued by anxiety that they have nothing new to say, struggle against the influence of earlier generations of poets. Bloom suggests that poets find their distinctive voices in an act of misprision, or misreading, of earlier influences, thus refiguring the poetic tradition. Although Bloom presents his thesis as a theory of poetry, it can be applied to other arts as well.

Canon: A group of literary works commonly regarded as central or authoritative to the literary tradition. For example, many critics concur that the Western canon—the central literary works of Western civilization—includes the writings of Homer, Shakespeare, Tolstoy, and the like. A canon is an evolving entity, as works are added or subtracted as their perceived value shifts over time. For example, the fiction of W. Somerset Maugham was central to the canon during the middle of the 20th century but is read less frequently today. In recent decades, the idea of an authoritative canon has come under attack, especially from feminist and postcolonial critics, who see the canon as a tyranny of dead white males that marginalizes less mainstream voices.

Death of the author: A post-structuralist theory, first advanced by Roland Barthes, that suggests that the reader, not the author, creates the meaning of a text. Ultimately, the very idea of an author is a fiction invented by the reader.

Diachronic/synchronic: Terms that Ferdinand de Saussure used to describe two different approaches to language. The diachronic approach looks at language as a historical process and examines the ways in which it has changed over time. The synchronic approach looks at language at a particular moment in time, without reference to history. Saussure’s structuralist approach is synchronic, for it studies language as a system of interrelated signs that have no reference to anything (such as history) outside of the system.

Dialogic/monologic: Terms that the Russian critic Mikhail Bakhtin used to distinguish works that are controlled by a single, authorial voice (monologic) from works in which no single voice predominates (dialogic or polyphonic). Bakhtin takes Leo Tolstoy and Fyodor Dostoevsky as examples of monologic and dialogic writing, respectively.

Diegesis/Mimesis: Terms that Aristotle first used to distinguish “telling” (diegesis) from “showing” (mimesis). In a play, for instance, most of the action is mimetic, but moments in which a character recounts what has happened offstage are diegetic.

Discourse: A post-structuralist term for the wider social and intellectual context in which communication takes place. The implication is that the meaning of works is as dependent on their surrounding context as it is on the content of the works themselves.

Exegesis: An explanation of a text that clarifies difficult passages and analyzes its contemporary relevance or application.

Explication: A close reading of a text that identifies and explains the figurative language and forms within the work.

Hermeneutics: The study of textual interpretation and of the way in which a text communicates meaning.

Intertextuality: The various relationships a text may have with other texts, through allusions, borrowing of formal or thematic elements, or simply by reference to traditional literary forms. The term is important to structuralist and poststructuralist critics, who argue that texts relate primarily to one another and not to an external reality.

Linguistics: The scientific study of language, encompassing, among other things, the study of syntax, semantics, and the evolution of language.

Logocentrism: The desire for an ultimate guarantee of meaning, whether God, Truth, Reason, or something else. Jacques Derrida criticizes the bulk of Western philosophy as being based on a logocentric “metaphysics of presence,” which insists on the presence of some such ultimate guarantee. The main goal of deconstruction is to undermine this belief.

Metalanguage: A technical language that explains and interprets the properties of ordinary language. For example, the vocabulary of literary criticism is a metalanguage that explains the ordinary language of literature. Post-structuralist critics argue that there is no such thing as a metalanguage; rather, they assert, all language is on an even plane and therefore there is no essential difference between literature and criticism.

Metanarrative: A larger framework within which we understand historical processes. For instance, a Marxist metanarrative sees history primarily as a history of changing material circumstances and class struggle. Post-structuralist critics draw our attention to the ways in which assumed metanarratives can be used as tools of political domination.

Mimesis: See diegesis/mimesis, above.

Monologic: See dialogic/monologic, above.

Narratology: The study of narrative, encompassing the different kinds of narrative voices, forms of narrative, and possibilities of narrative analysis.

Oedipus complex: Sigmund Freud’s theory that a male child feels unconscious jealousy toward his father and lust for his mother. The name comes from Sophocles’ play Oedipus Rex, in which the main character unknowingly kills his father and marries his mother. Freud applies this theory in an influential reading of Hamlet, in which he sees Hamlet as struggling with his admiration of Claudius, who fulfilled Hamlet’s own desire of murdering Hamlet’s father and marrying his mother.

Semantics: The branch of linguistics that studies the meanings of words.

Semiotics or semiology: Terms for the study of sign systems and the ways in which communication functions through conventions in sign systems. Semiotics is central to structuralist linguistics.

Sign/signifier/signified: Terms fundamental to Ferdinand de Saussure’s structuralism linguistics. A sign is a basic unit of meaning—a word, picture, or hand gesture, for instance, that conveys some meaning. A signifier is the perceptible aspect of a sign (e.g., the word “car”) while the signified is the conceptual aspect of a sign (e.g., the concept of a car). A referent is a physical object to which a sign system refers (e.g., the physical car itself).

Synchronic: See diachronic/synchronic above.

Monday, January 19, 2009

Published in the NYT: January 18, 2009
A new book argues that higher learning isn't what it used to be, and never will be again.

http://fish.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/01/18/the-last-professor/

Enjoy us while you have us!!
¡¡Disfruten de nosotros mientras puedan!!